Lewis v. Cricket Wireless, LLC, et al
Plaintiff: Johnette C. Lewis
Defendant: Cricket Communications, Inc., Cricket Wireless, LLC, Does 1-5, Kum & Go #361 and Ring Ring Master Dealer LLC
Case Number: 8:2015cv00359
Filed: October 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: John M. Gerrard
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER amending case progression deadlines.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
April 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER that the Plaintiff's motion to amend 36 is granted. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint with a corrected caption on or before April 29, 2016. Defendant Kum & Go #361's unopposed motion to dismiss 38 is granted, and Kum & Go #361 is dismissed as a defendant. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (KLF)
October 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Memorandum and Order together with four summons forms and four USM-285 forms to Plaintiff's attorney of record for service of process on the defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copies mailed as directed) (KLF) Modified on 10/5/2015 to correct text (KLF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Cricket Wireless, LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cricket Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cricket Wireless, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kum & Go #361
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ring Ring Master Dealer LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnette C. Lewis
Represented By: Ross R. Pesek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?