Fitlife Brands, Inc. v. MET-Rx Substrate Technology, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Nebraska District Court Fitlife Brands, Inc. v. MET-Rx Substrate Technology, Inc.

Fitlife Brands, Inc. v. MET-Rx Substrate Technology, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Fitlife Brands, Inc.
Defendant:	MET-Rx Substrate Technology
Case Number:	8:2015cv00388
Filed:	October 27, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge:	Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 1, 2016	Filing 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own court costs, litigation expenses and attorneys' fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
August 1, 2016	Filing 26 ORDER Upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on August 1, 2016, on or before August 31, 2016, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, a draft orde r which will fully dispose of the case. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The previously scheduled planning conference and all other deadlines are cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 8/31/2016.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 1, 2016

Filing 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own court costs, litigation expenses and attorneys' fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)

August 1, 2016

Filing 26 ORDER Upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on August 1, 2016, on or before August 31, 2016, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, a draft orde r which will fully dispose of the case. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The previously scheduled planning conference and all other deadlines are cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 8/31/2016.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fitlife Brands, Inc. v. MET-Rx Substrate Technology, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fitlife Brands, Inc.
Represented By:	Brian T. McKernan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MET-Rx Substrate Technology
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?