Stelly v. Agarwal et al
| Matthew C. Stelly |
| Arun Agarwal and White Lotus Management |
| 8:2015cv00407 |
| November 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. The court will enter judgment by a separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that on the court's own motion, Plaintiff will have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to file an amended complaint that sets forth the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to do s o will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in thismatter: April 4, 2016: Deadline for Plaintiff to file amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint shall be paid without payment of fees. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
