Parvanehgohar v. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Nebraska District Court Parvanehgohar v. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Parvanehgohar v. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Nasser Parvanehgohar
Defendant:	The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Case Number:	8:2015cv00422
Filed:	November 17, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:	Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge:	F.A. Gossett
Nature of Suit:	Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 9, 2016	Filing 22 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order 21 . 1. Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company's Motion to Affirm Administrator's Decision (Filing No. 17 ) is granted; 2. The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice; and 3. The Court will not assess costs or attorney's fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JAB)
January 22, 2016	Filing 13 ORDER that the parties shall have until February 5, 2016, to file the administrative record and applicable plan documents. The defendant shall have until February 19, 2016, to file a motion and brief to affirm the administrator's decision. The plaintiff shall have until March 4, 2016, to respond to the defendant's motion. The defendant shall have until March 18, 2016, to file a reply. Should the court require any further proceedings in the matter, the parties will be notified by the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MBM)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 9, 2016

Filing 22 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order 21 . 1. Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company's Motion to Affirm Administrator's Decision (Filing No. 17 ) is granted; 2. The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice; and 3. The Court will not assess costs or attorney's fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JAB)

January 22, 2016

Filing 13 ORDER that the parties shall have until February 5, 2016, to file the administrative record and applicable plan documents. The defendant shall have until February 19, 2016, to file a motion and brief to affirm the administrator's decision. The plaintiff shall have until March 4, 2016, to respond to the defendant's motion. The defendant shall have until March 18, 2016, to file a reply. Should the court require any further proceedings in the matter, the parties will be notified by the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MBM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parvanehgohar v. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nasser Parvanehgohar
Represented By:	Thomas J. Walsh, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Represented By:	Steven D. Davidson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?