Barfield v. Danny's Bar and Grill et al
| Jimmy Barfield |
| Daniel Arcuri, Danny's Bar and Grill and Does 1-5 Inclusive |
| 8:2016cv00021 |
| January 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER OF DISMISSAL that the report and recommendation, Filing No. 16, is adopted in its entirety; and This case is dismissed, without prejudice, for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER - The Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default and Quash Service (Filing No. 12 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall modify the docket to show that the entry of default is hereby set aside. The plaintiff has until the close of business on June 3, 2016, to file with the Clerk of Court evidence of proper service for Daniel J. Arcuri and show cause why this case should not be dismissed as against the defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER - The plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Filing No. 2 ) is granted; accordingly, the plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without payment of the filing fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
