Norris v. The Nebraska Supreme Court et al
| Heath E. Norris |
| Nebraska Department of Correctional Services' Director Scott R. Frakes and The Nebraska Supreme Court |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2016cv00059 |
| February 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER - that Kevin J. Bates' motions (1) to either join action or intervene thereon with/as party plaintiffs (filing no. 18 ), (2) for class action certification and appointment of class counsel (filing no. 19 ), and (3) to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs (filing no. 20 ) are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that this case is dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability will be issued. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER that Petitioner is given leave to file a reply together with Petitioner's responsive brief no later than June 14, 2016. The Clerk shall set a case management deadline of June 15, 2016 for Judge Kopf to review the file. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER that the Nebraska Attorney General's motion for enlargement of time 9 is granted. On behalf of Respondents, the Nebraska Attorney General shall answer or otherwise plead and submit a brief relating to such answer or other pleading on or before the close of business on Monday, April 25, 2016. The Clerk of Court shall reset the following pro se case management deadline: Check status April 25, 2016. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: The Clerk of this Court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and filing no. 1 to the Clerk of the Nebraska Supreme Court, Scott R. Frakes and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular f irst-class mail. The Clerk shall also mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Petitioner by regular first-class mail. On behalf of Respondents, the Nebraska Attorney General shall answer or otherwise plead and submit a brief relating to such ans wer or other pleading on or before the close of business on Friday, April 15, 2016. The Clerk of this Court shall set the following pro se case management deadline: "Check status April 18, 2016." Additionally, my chambers shall call this matter to my attention on April 18, 2016. The Motion to Certify Class (filing no. 5 ) is denied without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copies mailed as directed and to pro se party)(TCL)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (FilingNo. 2 ) is granted. The next step in this case is for the Court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The Court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
