Edwards v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Steven C. Edwards
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Case Number: 8:2016cv00157
Filed: April 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: John M. Gerrard
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that the plaintiff's counsel shall show cause, on or before September 26, 2016, why this case should not be dismissed as moot. Progression of this case is stayed pending substitution of a proper plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (LAC)
April 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (filing 2 ) is granted, and the complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this memorandum and order and a copy of General Order No. 2015-05, together with three summons forms and three copies of Form 285, to the plaintiff's attorney of record for service of process on the United States. If requested to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve all proc ess in this case without prepayment of fees from the plaintiff. In making such a request, plaintiff's counsel must complete the Marshal's Form 285, to be submitted to the Marshal with the completed summons forms and copies of the complaint. Without those forms, service of process by the Marshal cannot occur. This order is entered without prejudice to the Court later entering an order taxing costs in this case. No one, including any plaintiff, is relieved by this order from the obligati on to pay or to reimburse taxable costs after this action is over. The plaintiff's "Request from Requirement to Participate in the CM/ECF Filing System" (filing 4 ) is denied. The plaintiff's counsel is directed to comply with NE CivR 5.1 when filing documents in this case. Notice of remaining filings in this case will be provided to counsel electronically. The Clerk of the Court is directed to refuse future filings in this case that are presented nonelectronically unless they fall within the scope of NECivR 5.1(c). Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copies mailed as directed) (LAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven C. Edwards
Represented By: Paul W. Madgett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Represented By: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?