Martin v. State of Nebraska
| Carl A. Martin |
| State of Nebraska |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2016cv00246 |
| June 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER that although Martin's motions appear to be directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in the caption of the motions, to the extent that I have jurisdiction, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (fi ling no. 22 ) is granted, and the motion for certificate of appealability (filing no. 25 ), the motion for leave to use original record (filing no. 26 ) and the motion for appointment of counsel (filing no. 27 ) are denied. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order and the referenced motions to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the petition (filing no. 1 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. The court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. The court will enter a separate judgment in accordance with thisorder. Respondent 's motion for summary judgment (filing no. 12 ) is granted. Petitioner's motion to grant psychiatric expert (filing no. 17 ) and Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel and for an evidentiary hearing (filing no. 18 ) are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims are potentially cognizable in federal court. By October 11, 2016, Respondent must file a motion for s ummary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 11, 2016: deadline for Respondent to file state court record s in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file a motion for summary judgment, the following procedures must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the following procedur es must befollowed by Respondent and Petitioner. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: November 9, 2016: check for Respondent's answer and separate brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER granting the Petitioner's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
