LaFond v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Nebraska District Court LaFond v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

LaFond v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Plaintiff:	Andrew A. LaFond
Defendant:	Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number:	8:2016cv00256
Filed:	June 9, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:	F.A. Gossett
Nature of Suit:	Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action:	45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 23, 2016	Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL that the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Filing No. 12 ) is approved. The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court will not assess costs or attorney's fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (LAC)
August 17, 2016	Filing 11 ORDER upon notice of settlement by Donna M. Baker of theCoon & Associates law firm, counsel for plaintiff. On or before September 16, 2016, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to District Judge Laurie Smith Camp, at smithcamp@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case; Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice; and The Rule 26(f) planning report deadline is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 9/16/2016.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 23, 2016

Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL that the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Filing No. 12 ) is approved. The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court will not assess costs or attorney's fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (LAC)

August 17, 2016

Filing 11 ORDER upon notice of settlement by Donna M. Baker of theCoon & Associates law firm, counsel for plaintiff. On or before September 16, 2016, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to District Judge Laurie Smith Camp, at smithcamp@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case; Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice; and The Rule 26(f) planning report deadline is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 9/16/2016.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaFond v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew A. LaFond
Represented By:	James L. Cox, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?