Morinelli v. International Paper Company et al
| John Morinelli |
| International Paper Company and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. |
| 8:2016cv00446 |
| September 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, without costs, disbursements or fees to any party, and complete record waived. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LAC)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER that the defendants' Unopposed Motion to Compel the Nebraska Department of Labor to Produce Records (Filing No. 17 ) is granted. The Nebraska Department of Labor shall produce Plaintiff John Morinelli's unemployment records for the last three years as originally set forth in Defendants' Subpoena to the Nebraska Department of Labor. Defendants shall be responsible for reasonable photocopying expenses associated with the production of the documents by the Nebraska Department of Labor. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
