Reckley v. Gallup
| Patricia J. Reckley |
| Gallup |
| 8:2017cv00016 |
| January 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Filing No. 20 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Filing No. 15 ) is denied. Plaintiff's action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff will have 30 days in which to file an Amended Complaint that states a claim upon which relief can be granted. Failure to file an Amended Complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline usingthe following text: March 20, 2017: check for amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MBM)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Mail Returned 6 . Plaintiff has an obligationto keep the court informed of her current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and(g). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff must update her address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 2/27/2017: check for address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (SLP)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is provisionally granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in her case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of her claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reckley v. Gallup | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gallup | |
| Represented By: | Jordan R. Hasan |
| Represented By: | Tara A. Stingley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricia J. Reckley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
