Ware v. Frakes
David Ware |
Scott R. Frakes |
Nebraska Attorney General |
8:2017cv00085 |
March 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Laurie Smith Camp |
Cheryl R. Zwart |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, ECF No. 1 , filed by David Ware, is denied. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (LKO) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - By September 5, 2017, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (KLF) |
Filing 6 ORDER - Petitioner's request to proceed IFP (Filing No. 2 ) is denied. Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee within 30 days. Petitioner is warned that if the fee is not paid as required, the court may dismiss this case without further n otice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a case management deadline in this case using the following text: April 4, 2017: deadline for Petitioner to pay $5.00 filing fee. No further review of this case will take place until the filing fee is paid. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (KLF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.