Rosales v. Lexington Law Firm
Plaintiff: Eugene Rosales
Defendant: Lexington Law Firm
Case Number: 8:2017cv00087
Filed: March 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Presiding Judge: Robert F. Rossiter
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER - The above-captioned action is stayed pending rulings on Rosales' motion to stay, and the Florida parties' motion for approval of a class action settlement in Pena v. John C. Heath, Attorney At Law, PLLC, 1:18- cv-24407-UU ( S.D. FL). The clerk shall mail a courtesy copy of this order to District Judge Ursula Ungaro and Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan, both of whom are judges for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copies mailed as directed) (LKO)
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER - The current progression schedule, (Filing No. 42 ), remains in effect. If Defendant believes Plaintiff's deposition is necessary to address Plaintiff's response to Defendant's anticipated summary judgment motion, Defendant may move to conduct such discovery under Rule 56(d). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER denying as moot 41 Motion to Extend. On or before March 18, 2019, the Defendant shall file its anticipated motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's ability to serve as a class representative. Discovery on this issue shall be completed by February 28, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER - On or before November 30, 2018, Defendant shall move the court for a determination on whether Plaintiff has standing to pursue a claim against Defendant and if so, any re-definition of the class members who may have claimscommon and typical o f Plaintiff such that Plaintiff can adequately represent their interests. Plaintiffs response shall be filed on or before December 14, 2018, with any reply filed on or before December 21, 2018. The conference call previously set for November 20, 2018 is cancelled. To assure case progression, the clerk shall set an internal case management deadline for December 27, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JLA)
October 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER that Counsel shall submit a joint statement advising the court of the status of this case on or before October 12, 2017. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
June 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting 14 Defendnt's Motion to Stay. On balancing judicial and party resources against the minimal delay this stay will cause Plaintiff, the court finds a stay is appropriate. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
March 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL - This matter is before the court on the court's own motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), which states: "Any... judge... of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality mig ht reasonably be questioned." Upon review of the complaint in the above-designated case, the undersigned judge shall, and hereby does, recuse himself from the above-designated case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). The clerk shall refer the file to the Chief Judge for reassignment to a different magistrate judge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (LAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosales v. Lexington Law Firm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lexington Law Firm
Represented By: David N. Anthony
Represented By: Julie D. Hoffmeister
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugene Rosales
Represented By: Sergei Lemberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?