Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Union Pacific Railroad

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Nebraska District Court Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Union Pacific Railroad

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Union Pacific Railroad

Plaintiff:	Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
Defendant:	Union Pacific Railroad
Case Number:	8:2017cv00269
Filed:	July 25, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:	Cheryl R. Zwart
Presiding Judge:	Robert F. Rossiter
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action:	45 U.S.C. § 153 National Railroad Adjustment Board
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 13, 2017	Filing 21 PROGRESSION ORDER: This case involves the enforcement of an arbitration award. Based on the parties' Rule 26(f) Report, (Filing No. 18), the Court's review of this case will be limited to that sole issue and will be resolved by cross-mo tions for dismissal, Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: This case will be resolved by cross-motions for dismissal. The deadline for Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is November 13, 2017. Defendant's responding brief shall be filed on Dec ember 14, 2017. Plaintiff's reply brief in support shall be filed by January 3, 2018. The deadline for Defendant's cross motion for dismissal is December 14, 2017. Plaintiff's responding brief shall be filed by January 3, 2018. Defendant's reply brief shall be filed on January 24, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 13, 2017

Filing 21 PROGRESSION ORDER: This case involves the enforcement of an arbitration award. Based on the parties' Rule 26(f) Report, (Filing No. 18), the Court's review of this case will be limited to that sole issue and will be resolved by cross-mo tions for dismissal, Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: This case will be resolved by cross-motions for dismissal. The deadline for Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is November 13, 2017. Defendant's responding brief shall be filed on Dec ember 14, 2017. Plaintiff's reply brief in support shall be filed by January 3, 2018. The deadline for Defendant's cross motion for dismissal is December 14, 2017. Plaintiff's responding brief shall be filed by January 3, 2018. Defendant's reply brief shall be filed on January 24, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Union Pacific Railroad
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
Represented By:	Richard S. Edelman
Represented By:	Robert E. O'Connor, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad
Represented By:	Clifford A. Godiner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?