Fraction v. Rookstool

Fraction v. Rookstool

Plaintiff:	Bernard Fraction
Defendant:	Dennis Rookstool
Case Number:	8:2017cv00292
Filed:	August 10, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:	Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge:	Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit:	Other Fraud
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 28, 2017	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Complaint 1 filed by Bernard Fraction. Plaintiff cannot relitigate the validity of the tax deed against Rookstool, in either his individual or official capacity. This matter is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
August 10, 2017	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 28, 2017

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Complaint 1 filed by Bernard Fraction. Plaintiff cannot relitigate the validity of the tax deed against Rookstool, in either his individual or official capacity. This matter is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

August 10, 2017

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fraction v. Rookstool
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernard Fraction
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Rookstool
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?