Brown v. Kroll et al
| Mee Mee Brown |
| Kathy Herron, John Kroll, Beverly Leushen, Tabitha Waggoner and Rhonda Wilson |
| 8:2017cv00294 |
| August 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER - Plaintiff may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and without payment of the appellate filing fees. The Clerk of Court shall provide the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals with a copy of this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and regenerated to 8th Circuit) (LKO)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall provide the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals with a copy of this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 11 ) is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 22 ) is denied. Defendants' Motion to Strike (Filing No. 26 ) is denied. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time (Filing No. 24 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time (Filing No. 14 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall have January 18, 2018, to file any response to Defendants' pending summary judgment motion. The court shall enter a separate progression order in order to progress this case to final resolution and permit the parties to make appropriate discovery requests. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff's Supplemental Complaint (Filing No. 7 ) shall be stricken from the court file as an unauthorized pleading. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (Filing No. 6 ) is denied. The following claim s alleged in Plaintiff's Complaint (Filing No. 1 ) will be allowed to proceed. All other claims alleged in Plaintiff' s Complaint are dismissed.For service of process on Defendants John Kroll, Beverly Leushen, Kathy Herron, Tabitha Wa ggoner, and Rhonda Wilson, in their individual capacities, the clerk of the court is directed to complete a summons form and a USM-285 form for such defendants using the address 1700 N. Victory Road, P.O. Box 1209, Norfolk, NE 68702-1209 and forward them together with a copy of the Complaint (Filing No. 1) and a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Marshals Service. The Marshals Service shall serve Defendants personally in their individual capacities at the Norfolk Regional Center, 1700 N. V ictory Road, P.O. Box 1209, Norfolk, NE 68702-1209.4 Service may also be accomplished by using any of the following methods: residence, certified mail, or designated delivery service. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2 5-508.01 (Reissue 2016). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of the complaint on a defendant within 90 days of filing the complaint. However, Plaintiff is granted, on the court's own motion, an extension of time until 90 day s from the date of this order to complete service of process. The United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: January 8, 2018Check for completion of service of process. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
