Frank v. Douglas County, et al
| Jesse A. Frank |
| Correct Care Solutions, Department of Corrections, Douglas County and United States Government |
| 8:2017cv00298 |
| August 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER - that Defendants' motion for extension of time (Filing No. 41 ) is granted, and Plaintiff shall have until January 29, 2018, to respond to Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 38 ). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 15, 2017: check for address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for miscellaneous relief (Filing No. 22 ) is denied without prejudice. Defendant Douglas County is dismissed from the action without prejudice. Defendant Correct Care Solutions is dismissed from the act ion without prejudice. Officers Parks and Rose, in their official and individual capacities, are dismissed from the action without prejudice. Officers Estives, Grothe, and Grahm, in their official capacities only, are dismissed from the action withou t prejudice. The clerk of the court will modify the docket sheet to list Officers Officers Estives, Grothe, and Grahm, in their individual capacities, as the only Defendants of record. The only claim alleged in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Fil ing No. 21 ) that will be allowed to proceed is a Fourth Amendment "excessive force" claim alleged against Officers Estives, Grothe, and Grahm, in their individual capacities. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. For service o f process on Defendants Estives, Grothe, and Grahm, in their individual capacities, the clerk of the court is directed to complete a summons form and a USM-285 form for each Defendant using the address "Douglas County Correctional Center, 710 So uth 17th Street, Omaha, NE 68102," and forward them together with a copy of the Amended Complaint (Filing No. 21 ) and a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Marshals Service. The Marshals Service shall serve Defendants personally in their individual capacities at the Douglas County Correctional Center, 710 South 17th Street, Omaha, NE 68102. Service may also be accomplished by using any of the following methods: residence, certified mail, or designated delivery service. See Fed eral Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-508.01(Reissue 2016). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of the complaint on a defendant within 90 days of filing the complaint. However, Plaintiff is granted, on the cou rt's own motion, an extension of time until 90 days from the date of this order to complete service of process. The United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: January 29, 2018 - Check for completion of service of process. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER - The clerk of the court shall send Plaintiff a copy of this Memorandum and Order, together with a copy of the court's August 28th Memorandum and Order (Filing No. 8 ), at his last-known address. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from today� 39;s date in which to file an amended complaint that states a claim on which relief may be granted against Defendants Douglas County and Correct Care Solutions. Failure to file an amended complaint within 30 days will result in the court dismissing t his case without further notice to Plaintiff. Plaintiff's amended or supplemental complaint filed on September 8, 2017 (Filing No. 16 ), shall be stricken from the court file. All pending motions filed by Plaintiff (Filing Nos. 6 , 7 , 11 , and 15 ) are denied without prejudice. The clerk of the court is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: October 11, 2017: check for amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 6, 2017: check for address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: All claims alleged against Defendants U.S. Government and Department of Corrections are dismissed without prejudice and they shall no longer be parties to this action. The court will give Plaintiff 30 days to file an Amended C omplaint that states a claim on which relief may be granted against the remaining Defendants. Failure to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days will result in the court dimissing this case without further notice to Plaintiff. Party Department of Corrections and United States Government terminated. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 9/27/2017: Check for amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KMG,)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
