Perry v. Certified Transmission Rebuilders Inc.
Plaintiff: John A. Perry
Defendant: Certified Transmission Rebuilders Inc.
Case Number: 8:2017cv00322
Filed: September 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Filing No. 13 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
February 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the court's orders. The court will enter judgment by separate written document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
January 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff will be given 20 days to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to file suit within 90 days of his receipt of a right-to-sue notice. To be clear, if Plaintiff did file suit within 90 days of his receipt of the right-to-sue notice, he need only file a copy of the notice in order to comply with this memorandum and order. However, if Plaintiff did not file suit within 90 days of his receipt of the right-to-sue notice, Plaintiff must also sh ow that equitable or exceptional circumstances exist that warrant tolling of the 90-day period. This matter will be dismissed without further notice if Plaintiff fails to comply with this memorandum and order. The court directs the clerk of the court to set the following pro se case management deadline in this matter: January 30, 2018: Deadline for Plaintiff to show cause. The court reserves the right to conduct further review of Plaintiff's claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) after Plaintiff addresses the matters set forth in this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
November 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have 30 days to amend his Complaint to clearly specify the relief he seeks. If Plaintiff fails to file an adequate amended complaint within 30 days, this matter will be dismissed without further notice. In the e vent Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff shall restate the allegations of the current Complaint (Filing No. 1 ) and any new allegations. Failure to consolidate all claims into one document may result in the abandonment of claims. Plainti ff will have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to file a copy of the right-to-sue notice received in response to his charge of discrimination dated July 14, 2016. (See Filing No. 1 at CM/ECF pp. 67.) To the extent Plaintiff did not file suit within 90 days of his receipt of the right-to-sue notice, he must show that equitable or exceptional circumstances exist that warrant tolling of the 90-day period. The court reserves the right to conduct further review of Plaintiff& #039;s claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) after Plaintiff addresses the matters set forth in this Memorandum and Order. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 22, 2017: Check for Plaintiff's amended complaint and response. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
September 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perry v. Certified Transmission Rebuilders Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certified Transmission Rebuilders Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John A. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?