Alarcon-Chavez v. The State of Nebraska et al
Petitioner: Leodan Alarcon-Chavez
Respondent: Scott Frakes and The State of Nebraska
Case Number: 8:2017cv00345
Filed: September 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 38 JUDGEMENT - Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order entered this date, Petitioner's second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus (filing 35 ) is dismissed with prejudice, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (filing no. 25 ) is granted. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
October 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. The court will enter a separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Petitioner's motion (filing no. 20 ) is granted to the extent that the court acknowledges that dismissal of Petitioner's habeas petition as a successive petition is not at issue in this proceeding. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
February 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The clerk of the court is directed to add the Nebraska Attorney General as an Interested Party and provide a copy of this order, along with copies of the habeas petition (Filing No. 1 ) and the court's January 11, 2018 Me morandum and Order (Filing No. 8 ), to the Nebraska Attorney General. On the court's own motion, Respondents shall have until April 16, 2018, to file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: April 16, 2018: deadline for Respondents to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The clerk of the court is dir ected to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: May 16, 2018: check for Respondents' answer and separate brief. The clerk of the court is directed to terminate the prior pro se case management deadlines of February 26, 2018, and March 27, 2018. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the habeas corpus petition (Filing No. 1 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as they are set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal cou rt. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filing No. 3 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. By February 26, 2018, Respondents must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the co urt is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: February 26, 2018: deadline for Respondents to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 27, 2018: check for Respondents' answer and separate brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's request to proceed IFP (Filing No. 2 ) is denied. Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee within 30 days. Petitioner is warned that if the fee is not paid as required, the court may dismiss this case wi thout further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 30, 2017: deadline for Petitioner to pay $5.00 filing fee. No further review of this case will take place until the filing fee is paid. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alarcon-Chavez v. The State of Nebraska et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Leodan Alarcon-Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Frakes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The State of Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?