Martin v. Omaha Public Power District
Plaintiff: Cordell Martin
Defendant: Omaha Public Power District
Case Number: 8:2017cv00347
Filed: September 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Susan M. Bazis
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER regarding Request 43 filed by Cordell Martin. The court is unable to grant the relief the plaintiff seeks. The form request applies only to transcripts of proceedings in this court. The plaintiff, now pro se, was represented by counse l at the time of the deposition. He should contact former counsel or the court reporter who recorded the deposition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's request for transcript (Filing No. 43) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
June 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER - The Amended Motion to Withdraw as Plaintiff's Counsel (Filing No. 36 ) is granted. Mr. White shall immediately serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff and thereafter file proof of service showing compliance with this Order, listing the names and addresses of the persons to whom notice was sent. Mr. White and White & Jorgensen will not be relieved of applicable duties to the Court, Plaintiff, and opposing counsel until proof of service is filed. Upon the filing of proof of service p ursuant to Paragraph 2 of this Order, Plaintiff will be deemed to be proceeding pro se, that is, without the assistance of counsel, unless substitute counsel has entered a written appearance on his behalf. If substitute counsel has not entered a writ ten appearance, Plaintiff shall file a written notice with the Clerk of Court, notifying the Court of Plaintiffs current address and telephone number. Plaintiff shall do so within five (5) business days of being served with this Order. Plaintiff may retain substitute counsel at any time. However, until such time as substitute counsel enters a written appearance, Plaintiff shall comply with all orders of this Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of sanctions, including payment of costs and attorneys' fees, and/or the entry of default. Upon Mr. White's submission of proof of service as described in Paragraph 2 of this Order, the Clerk of Court shall terminate the appearance of Mr. White and the law firm of White & Jorgensen, and terminate further notices to them in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Omaha Public Power District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cordell Martin
Represented By: Amy S. Jorgensen
Represented By: Benjamin N. White
Represented By: Thomas M. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omaha Public Power District
Represented By: Patrick J. Barrett
Represented By: Rhianna A. Kittrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?