Gardner v. State of Nebraska
| State of Nebraska |
| Justin Gardner |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2017cv00390 |
| October 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER - Petitioner may not proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. This matter is closed, and Petitioner should refrain from filing any further frivolous appeals. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's motion for relief in all of the above cases (Filing 55, Case No. 8:17CV255; Filing 35, Case No. 8:17CV389; Filing 47 , Case No. 8:17CV390; Filing 49, Case No. 8:18CV241; Filing 30, Case No. 8:18CV557) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding: Notice of Appeal to USCA 41 filed by Justin Gardner - Petitioner may not proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. This matter is closed, and Petitioner should refrain from filing any further frivolous appeals. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Petitioner may not proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal IFP (filing no. 26 ) is denied. The clerk of the court is directed to respond to Petitioners letter (filing no. 27 at CM/ECF p. 4) and provide him the requested forms. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(LAC)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the court's prior Memorandum and Order (filing no. 10 ) dated April 2, 2018, is vacated, in part, to the extent it denied Petitioner's motion to extend. The court now finds that Petitioners motion to extend th e time to file a notice of appeal (filing no. 9 ) should be granted and his Notice of Appeal (filing no. 12 ) is deemed timely. The court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith, and the court will not act on Petitioner's notice of appeal. (Filing No. 12 ) The clerk of court is directed to send a copy of Petitioner's notice of appeal and a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the motion for reconsideration (filing no. 8 ) and motion to extend (filing no. 9 ) are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1 ) is denied without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner is directed to submit the $5.00 fee to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: November 17, 2017: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
