Teague v. Regent Financial Group, Inc. et al
| Ed Teague, II |
| Flagstar Bank, FSB, Ginnie Mae, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"), Planet Home Lending, LLC and Regent Financial Group, Inc. |
| 8:2017cv00416 |
| October 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Michael D. Nelson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER that this matter is before the Court on pro se plaintiff's notice of appeal, Filing No. 31. The plaintiff appeals judgment in favor of the defendants and against him. Filing No. 30. However, the plaintiff failed to pay the required 6;505.00 filing fee for the notice of appeal. See NECivR 3.2 and 3.3. Additionally, the plaintiff failed to file an affidavit or otherwise show this Court that he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on his appeal. Accordingly, the Court will give him 14 days from the date of this Order to file appropriate documentation showing he is entitled to appeal in forma pauperis or to pay the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of Court shall forward the appropriate paperwork to plaintiff along with this Order via mail to plaintiff's last known address. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party with form as directed)(ADB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
