Chapman v. Retelsdorf et al
| Billie Joe Chapman |
| Brenda Leuck, Sean Lynch, Judge Leigh Ann Retelsdorf and Ryan Templeton |
| 8:2017cv00425 |
| November 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Chapman's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2 ) is denied. Chapman's Motion for Order (Filing No. 9 ) and Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filing No. 10 ) are denied as moot. This case is dismisse d without prejudice and a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Any notice of appeal filed by Chapman must be accompanied by the $505.00 appellate filing fee because Chapman will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff has 30 days to either show cause for why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) or pay the court's $400.00 filing and administrative fees. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: December 18, 2017: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause or pay fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
