Hancock el. v. Lincoln Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Eugene Hancock el.
Defendant: Ofc Baker, Ofc Callese, Lincoln Police Department, Sgt Phillips and K. Russell
Case Number: 8:2017cv00488
Filed: December 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Filing 29 ) is granted, and thisaction is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
June 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Filing No. 22 ) is granted, and, accordingly, that: Plaintiff shall have an additional 30 days in which to file an Amended Complaint that states a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk of the court is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: July 30, 2018: check for amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
May 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff will have 30 days in which to file an Amended Complaint which states a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's failure to file an Amended Complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order will re sult in dismissal of this action without further notice. Plaintiff's request for a status report (Filing 16 ) is denied withoutprejudice. Plaintiff's motion to amend (Filing 18 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for co pies (Filing 19 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for summonses (Filing 20 ) is denied without prejudice. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline using the following text: June 28, 2018: check for amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
April 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Request to Re-Open Case (Filing No. 13 ), liberally construed as a motion for relief from judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), is granted. The court's Judgment entered on J anuary 25, 2018 (Filing No. 12 ), is vacated and this case is reinstated to the active docket. Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement and Amend Complaint (Filing No. 14 ) is denied. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline with the following text: May 7, 2018: check for completion of initial review. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
January 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (Filing No. 2 ), is granted. The filing fee shall be collected and remitted, as funds exist, in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid, the prisoner shall be obligated to pay, and the agency having custody of the prisoner shall forward to the clerk of the court, 20 percent of the preceding month's income in such months as the account exceeds $10.00. The clerk of th e court shall serve a copy of this order on the appropriate financial officer for Plaintiff's current institution. The next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Plaintiff's current institution; e-mailed to Finance) (KLF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hancock el. v. Lincoln Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ofc Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ofc Callese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lincoln Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Eugene Hancock el.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?