Brundo v. Christ the King Church of Omaha
Dr. Barbara Brundo |
Christ the King Church of Omaha |
8:2018cv00041 |
March 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G. Kopf |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal (Filing No. 6 ) is granted, and Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal (Filing No. 2 ) is deemed timely filed. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brundo v. Christ the King Church of Omaha | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dr. Barbara Brundo | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Christ the King Church of Omaha | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.