Gruttemeyer v. Transit Authority of the City of Omaha, et al
Plaintiff: John M. Gruttemeyer
Defendant: Transit Authority of the City of Omaha and Transportation Workers Union of America, Local 223
Case Number: 8:2018cv00070
Filed: February 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Michael D. Nelson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER TO DESTROY - Counsel for both the plaintiff and the defendant notified the court on February 13, 2023 that they wish the following exhibits held by the court in this matter to be destroyed from the jury trial on March 2-5, 2020. Pursuant NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), if counsel fails to show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed, the clerk's office is directed to destroy the above- listed exhibits 14 days from the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 161 ORDER -The Court finds the motion should be granted 158 and 160 . The Clerk of Court shall release the bond to The Transit Authority of the City of Omaha, Attn: Edith Simpson, 2222 Cuming Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Emailed to Finance)(MKR)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER - The stay of execution on the judgment is lifted. The plaintiff is instructed to file a motion to finally distribute the deposited funds within 14 days of the date of this order; the defendant shall file any response within 7 days thereafter. Counsel for the plaintiff is to complete an Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 and a Form AO213 and submit the completed forms to the Clerk of Court. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 144 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the plaintiff motion for attorney fees (Filing No. 123 ) is granted. The plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $103,054.50. A judgment for attorney fees in accordance with this Memorandum and Order will be entered. Execution on the judgment for attorney fees is stayed pending appeal. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (LAC)
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER : The renewed oral motion for judgment as a matter of law made by the defendant at the close of evidence (Filing No. 95), is overruled. A judgment will be entered on the jury verdict. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
February 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the parties' motions in limine (Filing Nos. 63 , 67 , and 82 ) are granted in part and denied in part as set forth in this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
August 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER that on the court's own motion, the pretrial conference and jury trial are continued pending further order of the court. If this case is not fully resolved by summary judgment, within ten (10) days after the summary judgment ruling, the parties shall contact the undersigned magistrate judge's chambers to re-schedule the pretrial conference and trial. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting 30 Motion to Extend. Summary judgment motions shall be filed on or before March 15, 2019. Jury Trial set for 7/30/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 3, Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. Pretrial Conference set for 7/10/2019 at 09:00 AM Internet/Telephonic Conferencing before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - The Plaintiff, John M. Gruttemeyer, and the Defendants, The Transit Authority of the City of Omaha d/b/a Metro Area Transit and Transportation Workers Union of America, Local 223 hereby stipulate and agree to and req uest the entry of this Protective Order ("Protective Order") concerning disclosure, use, and protection of confidential or proprietary documents and information, including, but not limited to, commercial and/or financial information that is not available in the public domain. The parties hereby stipulate and IT IS ORDERED. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gruttemeyer v. Transit Authority of the City of Omaha, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John M. Gruttemeyer
Represented By: Alexis S. Mullaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transit Authority of the City of Omaha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transportation Workers Union of America, Local 223
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?