B. Thomas & Company v. Universal Warranty Corporation et al
| B. Thomas and Company |
| Ally Insurance Holdings Inc. and Universal Warranty Corp. |
| 8:2018cv00112 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Michael D. Nelson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 79 ) is granted in full. Defendants Motion in Limine (Filing 83 ) is denied as moot. Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed in its entirety. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Judge Brian C. Buescher. (LAC)
|
|
Filing
95
AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - The Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 93 ) is granted. The Final Pretrial Conference with the assigned magistrate judge is set for March 25, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. in chamb ers, 111 South 18th Plaza, Suite 2271, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska. A 10-day jury trial is set to commence, at the Court's call, during the week of May 12, 2020, in Omaha, Nebraska, before the Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF)
|
|
Filing
50
PROTECTIVE ORDER granting Unopposed Motion for Protective Order 49 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
