Middleton et al v. Complete Nutrition Franchising, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bright Future Holdings, LLC, Harvester Nutrition, LLC, Herman Hourie, Katherina Jerak, M.G. Nutrition, LLC, Donovan Middleton, Nutrition Castle, LLC, Edgar Rojas, Christina Soares, Vivify, Inc. and Warrior Fitness & Nutrition, LLC
Defendant:
Complete Nutrition Franchising, LLC
Case Number:
8:2018cv00115
Filed:
March 9, 2018
Court:
Nebraska District Court
Office:
8 Omaha Office
Referring Judge:
Susan M. Bazis
Presiding Judge:
Robert F. Rossiter
Nature of Suit:
Contract: Franchise
Cause of Action:
28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| November 19, 2018 | 44 |
ORDER - Defendant's Motion to Sever (Filing No. 28 ) is granted. Plaintiffs will be required to prosecute their claims in eight separate actions to be grouped as follows: (a) claims brought by Middleton and Harvester; (b) claims brought by Roja s and Soares; (c) claims brought by Hourie and Nutrition Castle; (d) claims brought by Bright Future; (e) claims brought by Vivify; (f) claims brought by Warrior Fitness; (g) claims brought by Jerak; and (h) claims brought by M.G. The Clerk of Court is directed to modify the docket sheet to reflect that Middleton and Harvester are the plaintiffs in this case. The Clerk of Court shall then open seven new case files which shall be captioned to reflect the groupings of plaintiffs as set forth in Pa ragraph 1 above. The Clerk of Court shall copy all docket entries from the present file into each of the new case files and docket this Order in all cases. These cases should be denoted as being related and be assigned to the same judges. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint in their respective actions by December 20, 2018. Each amended complaint must be specific to the claims of only the named plaintiff(s) in that specific case. Defendant shall have 21 days to file an answer in each case. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend (Filing No. 36 ) is denied as moot. Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement (Filing No. 26 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
