Cook v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
| Rosemary Cook |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 8:2018cv00237 |
| May 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Michael D. Nelson |
| Robert F. Rossiter |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff Rosemary Cook is ordered to show cause by July 16, 2019 why summary judgment should not be entered in Walmart's favor. Failure to respond may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER - The Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff (Filing No. 17) filed by Frank Younes and Monte Neilan is granted. Plaintiffs counsel shall immediately serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff and thereafter file proof of service showing compl iance with this Order, listing the name and address of the person to whom notice was sent. Frank Younes and Monte Neilan will not be relieved of applicable duties to the Court, Plaintiff, and opposing counsel until proof of service is filed. Upon fil ing of proof of service pursuant to Paragraph 2 of this Order, Plaintiff will be deemed to be proceeding pro se, that is, without the assistance of counsel, unless substitute counsel enters a written appearance on her behalf. If substitute counsel do es not enter a written appearance, Plaintiff shall provide the Clerk of Court her current address and telephone number within five days of being served with this Order. Plaintiff may retain substitute counsel at any time. However, until such t ime as substitute counsel enters a written appearance, Plaintiff must comply with all case progression deadlines, orders of this Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Failure to comply with these requirements m ay result in the imposition of sanctions, including payment of costs, attorneys fees, and/or dismissal of the case. Upon submission of proof of service as described in Paragraph 2 of this Order, Frank Younes and Monte Neilans appearance as counsel of record for Plaintiff will be terminated, and the Clerk of Court shall terminate electronic notice to them in this case. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that certain deadlines set forth in the Final Progression Order (Filing No. 14 ) are extended as follows: All depositions, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by May 1, 2019. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate judge remains scheduled for September 30, 2019, at 11:00 a.m., and will be conducted in chambers. The parties' proposed Pretrial Conference Order and Exhibit List(s) must be emailed to nelson@ned.uscourts.gov, in Word format, by 3:00 p.m. on September 23, 2019. The four (4) jury day trial remains set to commence, at the Court's call, during the week of October 15, 2019, in Omaha, Nebraska, before the Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., United States District Judge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER - that the Joint Motions to Extend Expert Deadlines is granted, and the expert deadlines in the Courts previous Order (Filing No. 14) are extended as follows: 1. Each plaintiff, counter-claimant, and cross-claimant shall identify expert wit nesses by February 28, 2019, and shall serve expert reports by March 15, 2019. Each defendant, counter-defendant, and cross-defendant shall identify expert witnesses by April 1, 2019, and shall serve expert reports by April 16 , 2019. 2. Motions in limine challenging the admissibility of expert testimony at trial under Fed. R. Evid. 702, see Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), and Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), shall be filed by June 3, 2019, and accompanied by a request for a hearing if necessary. Failure to timely move for a hearing may constitute waiver of the request for a hearing Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cook v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosemary Cook | |
| Represented By: | Francis E. Younes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Heidi A. Guttau-Fox |
| Represented By: | Brian D. Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
