Home Instead, Inc. v. Oliver et al
| Home Instead, Inc. |
| Tiffany Oliver and Prevailing Grace, LLC |
| 8:2018cv00314 |
| July 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Susan M Bazis |
| John M Gerrard |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Plaintiff Home Instead, Inc.. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (LKO) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-3716440), by Attorney Theresa D. Koller on behalf of Home Instead, Inc.(Koller, Theresa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
