Epp v. Frakes et al
| William Epp |
| Scott Busboom, Brian Gage, Scott Frakes, Brad Hansen, Michael Kenney, Diane Sabatka-Rine, Doug Peterson and Chuck Glen |
| 8:2018cv00418 |
| September 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TEXT ENTRY THAT PARTIAL FILING fee paid on behalf of William Epp on 10/30/18. Receipt number 8049384, in the amount of $ 8.10. (ADB) |
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (Filing No. #5 ) is granted. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $8.10 within 30 days, unless the court extends the time in which he has to pay in response to a written motion. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution must collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and forward those payments to the court. The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: November 1, 2018: initial partial filing fee payment due. Plaintiff is advised that, following payment of the initial partial filing fee, the next step in Plaintiffs case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copies mailed as directed) (LKO)
|
| Filing 6 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Plaintiff William Epp. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff William Epp. (LKO) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to submit the $400.00 fees to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: October 9, 2018: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2016-02: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Scott Busboom, Scott Frakes, Brian Gage, Chuck Glen, Brad Hansen, Michael Kenney, Doug Peterson and Diane Sabatka-Rine filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff William Epp. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
