Anderson v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation,
Michael Anderson |
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, and Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation |
8:2018cv00482 |
October 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Susan M Bazis |
Laurie Smith Camp |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint by December 17, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRH) |
Filing 5 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Mark E. Novotny on behalf of Defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation.(Novotny, Mark) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LKO) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. (LKO) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation regarding Complaint, #1 . (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-3781997), by Attorney Sergei Lemberg on behalf of Michael Anderson (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lemberg, Sergei) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.