White v. United HealthCare Services, Inc.
| Candace A. White |
| United HealthCare Services, Inc. |
| 8:2018cv00495 |
| October 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due 7/12/19. Jury Trial set for 11/12/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Judge Robert F. Rossiter Jr.. Pretrial Conference set for 10/29/2019 at 10:30 AM Internet/Telephonic Conferencing before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Telephone Conference set for 2/12/2019 at 10:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Candace A. White.(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER granting the parties joint request for an extension of the Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline. The Rule 26 Meeting Report shall be filed on or before December 7, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent UnitedHealth Group, Incorporated for United HealthCare Services, Inc.. by Attorney Brock J. Pohlmeier on behalf of Defendants United HealthCare Services, Inc., UnitedHealth Group, Incorporated.(Pohlmeier, Brock) |
|
Filing 6
CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - 1) The parties shall review the Nebraska magistrate judges' practices posted at Civil Case Management Practices. 2) Counsel for the parties shall confer and, on or before November 30, 2018, they shall jointly file a Form 35 (Rule 26 (f)) Report, a copy of which can be found at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms in Word and WordPerfect format. Unless the parties agree otherwise, Plaintiff(s) shall prepare the initial draft of the Report and then forward it to Defendant(s) for further additions or revisions. 3) On or before November 21, 2018, a party shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to set a conference call if: a. One or more of the parties believes a planning conference is needed to complete the Rule 26(f) Report; or b. The parties cannot agree on one or more of the deadlines identified or case progression issues raised in the Rule 26(f) Report, or c. The parties are currently and actively pursuing settlement and believe preparing and filing a Rule 26(f) Report may be unnecessary. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)
|
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant United HealthCare Services, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(JAB) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by United HealthCare Services, Inc. (Pohlmeier, Brock) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Candace A. White from In the District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, Case number CI 18-8202 ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-3788406) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Brock J. Pohlmeier on behalf of United HealthCare Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Pohlmeier, Brock) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: White v. United HealthCare Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Candace A. White | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer L. Turco Meyer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United HealthCare Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brock J. Pohlmeier |
| Represented By: | Michaelle L. Baumert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
