McClinton v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Damon L McClinton and Damon L. McClinton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Case Number: 8:2018cv00598
Filed: December 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Michael D Nelson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs #2 is approved. Plaintiff may proceed in this matter without prepaying fees or costs. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SLP)
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2015-05: In the Matter of Procedures for Social Security Cases. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (LKO)
December 28, 2018 Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO)
December 27, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Attorney Wes Kappelman on behalf of Plaintiff Damon L McClinton.(Kappelman, Wes)
December 27, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, by Attorney Wes Kappelman on behalf of Damon L McClinton (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kappelman, Wes)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McClinton v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damon L McClinton
Represented By: Wes Kappelman
Represented By: Sean D. Cuddigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damon L. McClinton
Represented By: Wes Kappelman
Represented By: Sean D. Cuddigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Represented By: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?