Smith v. Lewien
| Reginald Smith |
| Barb Lewien |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2019cv00080 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Reginald Smith on 03/07/2019. Receipt number 8050952, in the amount of $ 5.00. (LAC) |
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Petitioner is directed to submit the $5.00 fee to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: March 21, 2019: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(LAC)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by pro se petitioner Reginald Smith. (LAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
