Shields v. Holtmeyer et al
Thomas Shields |
James E. Holtmeyer and Sergio G. Gutierrez |
8:2019cv00229 |
May 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Susan M Bazis |
Laurie Smith Camp |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 7/25/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF) |
Filing 12 RESTRICTED CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Amended Complaint #10 with Jury Demand by Sergio G. Gutierrez, James E. Holtmeyer (Wiesen, Ryan) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT with with jury demand against Defendant All Defendants, by Attorney Daniel J. Gutman on behalf of Thomas Shields(Gutman, Daniel) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Ryan J. Wiesen on behalf of Defendants Sergio G. Gutierrez, James E. Holtmeyer (Wiesen, Ryan) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to Seal. Filing Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 6 shall remain under seal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRH) |
Filing 7 UNOPPOSED MOTION to file under Seal Unopposed Motion to Seal Filings by Attorney William J. Acosta-Trejo on behalf of Defendants Sergio G. Gutierrez, James E. Holtmeyer.(Acosta-Trejo, William) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Sergio G. Gutierrez on 5/25/2019. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (Gutman, Daniel) Modified on 5/31/2019 to add restricted language per order 8 (ADB). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant James E. Holtmeyer on 5/25/2019. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (Gutman, Daniel) Modified on 5/31/2019 to add restricted language per order 8 (ADB). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendants Sergio G. Gutierrez and James E. Holtmeyer. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO) Modified on 5/31/2019 to add restricted language per order 8 (ADB). |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Laurie Smith Camp and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (Gutman, Daniel) Modified on 5/31/2019 to add restricted language per order 8 (ADB). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Sergio G. Gutierrez, James E. Holtmeyer ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-3944157), by Attorney Daniel J. Gutman on behalf of Thomas Shields(Gutman, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.