Jones v. Carter et al
| Manuel Jones and Marvel Jones |
| John Carter, City of Lincoln, County of Lancaster County, Nebraska, Chife of Police Department, County of Lancaster County Sheriff Department, Jeffrey Howard, Robert Hayes, Timothy Carmichael, Nebraska Police Department, Sheriff Officer, Dennis R. Keefe, Michael D. Gooch, Public Defender Office and City of Lincoln, Nebraska Police Department |
| 8:2019cv00288 |
| July 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Correction of Spelling of First Name on behalf of Plaintiff Marvel Jones.(TCL) |
Filing 9
JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the court's Memorandum and Order #8 filed this date, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED providing that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: Plaintiff's Complaint (Filing #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Filing #4 ) is denied. The court shall enter judgment by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 6
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2016-02: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel on behalf of Plaintiff Marvel Jones.(LKO) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Plaintiff Marvel Jones. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Marvel Jones.(LKO) |
| Filing 1 RESTRICTED - COMPLAINT against Timothy Carmichael, John Carter, Chife of Police Department, City of Lincoln, Nebraska Police Department, County of Lancaster County Sheriff Department, County of Lancaster County, Nebraska, Michael D. Gooch, Robert Hayes, Jeffrey Howard, Dennis R. Keefe, Public Defender Office, and Sheriff Officer filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Marvel Jones. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO) Modified on 7/2/2019 to restrict access and correct party names pursuant to Pro Se Law Clerk (CS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
