Mesadieu v. Frakes et al
Michael I. Mesadieli and Michael I. Mesadieu |
Scott Frakes, Brad Hansen and Nebraska Attorney General |
8:2019cv00289 |
July 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Memorandum and Order,,,, Set/Reset Pro Se Case Management Deadlines,,, #6 , MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Stacy M. Foust on behalf of Respondents Scott Frakes, Brad Hansen.(Foust, Stacy) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Stacy M. Foust on behalf of Respondents Scott Frakes, Brad Hansen (Foust, Stacy) |
|
|
Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC) |
Filing 3 PRISONER ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE by Petitioner Michael I. Mesadieu. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LAC) Modified on 7/2/2019 Plaintiff's name modified (LAC). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Michael I. Mesadieu.(LAC) Modified on 7/2/2019 Plaintiff's name modified (LAC). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by pro se petitioner Michael I. Mesadieu. (LAC) Modified on 7/2/2019 Plaintiff's name modified. (LAC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.