United States of America v. Sixty-Four (64) Assorted Firearms And 33,193 Rounds of Assorted Ammunition
United States of America |
SIXTY-FOUR (64) ASSORTED FIREARMS AND 33,193 ROUNDS OF ASSORTED AMMUNITION |
Kirk Holmes and Jeana Marie Velasquez |
8:2019cv00315 |
July 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Michael D Nelson |
Robert F Rossiter |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Claimants shall have an extension of time to September 23, 2019, to file an answer. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading Extension to File Answer by Attorney Donald L. Schense on behalf of Claimants Kirk Holmes, Jeana Marie Velasquez, Defendant Sixty-Four (64) Assorted Firearms And 33,193 Rounds of Assorted Ammunition.(Schense, Donald) |
Filing 11 Verified CLAIM By Verified Claimants by Sixty-Four (64) Assorted Firearms And 33,193 Rounds of Assorted Ammunition (Schense, Donald) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Donald L. Schense has not paid the biennial assessment. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (KLF) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER that the Complaint (Filing No. #1 ) filed by United States of America shall be restricted. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JSF) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Donald L. Schense on behalf of Defendant Sixty-Four (64) Assorted Firearms And 33,193 Rounds of Assorted Ammunition (Schense, Donald) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Service by Attorney Amy B. Blackburn on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Blackburn, Amy) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR PUBLICATION - This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Publication (Filing No. #5 ), filed by the United States of America. The Motion is granted and the United States is directed to publish such notification as requested. IT IS SO ORDERED. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (KMM) |
Filing 5 MOTION FOR PUBLICATION by Attorney Amy B. Blackburn on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America.(Blackburn, Amy) |
Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LAC) |
Filing 3 WARRANT IN REM Issued (Copy emailed to USA) (KMM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM by Attorney Amy B. Blackburn on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Blackburn, Amy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against SIXTY-FOUR (64) ASSORTED FIREARMS AND 33,193 ROUNDS OF ASSORTED AMMUNITION, by Attorney Amy B. Blackburn on behalf of United States of America (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Blackburn, Amy) Modified on 8/16/2019 to add ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (JSF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.