Nehls v. Nebraska
Richard Nehls |
Nebraska |
8:2019cv00362 |
August 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 COPY of Order from USCA - 8th Circuit (19-3131) If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. (KLF) |
Filing 14 Letter from USCA - 8th Circuit: case docketed under case number 19-3131 as to Notice of Appeal #9 . (KMM) |
Filing 13 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by Clerk to USCA regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA #9 of Judgment #8 . Notice of Appeal filed on 9/16/2019 by Plaintiff Richard Nehls. (JAB) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Richard Nehls. (KLF) |
Filing 10 TEXT NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY by Deputy Clerk that the Notice of Appeal to USCA #9 has been filed and is considered deficient because the document is not signed. The plaintiff shall correct the deficiency within 15 days of the date of this entry or the pleading may be stricken from the record of this case. See NECivR 11.1. (Copy mailed to pro se party along with Notice of Appeal to USCA #9 ) (KLF) Satisfied on 9/23/2019 (KLF). |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL regarding Judgment #8 on behalf of Plaintiff Richard Nehls. (KLF) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/23/2019: #1 Signed Document) (KLF). |
Filing 8 JUDGMENT - This matter is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons discussed in the Memorandum and Order entered on this date. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint (filing no. #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. The court will enter judgment by a separate document. Plaintiff's pending Motion for Appointment of Counsel (filing no. #3 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business and will address Plaintiff's other pending motion at that time. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB) |
Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2016-02: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Senior Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel on behalf of Plaintiff Richard Nehls. (KLF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Richard Nehls. (KLF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nebraska filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Richard Nehls. (KLF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nehls v. Nebraska | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Richard Nehls | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nebraska | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.