Franklin v. Heartland Family Services
| Travis B Franklin and Travis B. Franklin |
| Heartland Family Services |
| 8:2019cv00369 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting in part and denying in part #8 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave. This action is stayed until November 22, 2019 to allow Plaintiff time to obtain counsel. The Motion to Dismiss #5 will be held in abeyance during this time. Plaintiff's request to file an amended complaint is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Plaintiff shall file a report with the Court no later than November 22, 2019 advising as to whether counsel will be entering an appearance on his behalf. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRH)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint on behalf of Plaintiff Travis B. Franklin.(KLF) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The Court orders Franklin to show cause on or by October 17, 2019, why this case should not be dismissed. Failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
| Filing 6 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #5 by Attorney Leigh C. Joyce on behalf of Defendant Heartland Family Services.(Joyce, Leigh) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Attorney Leigh C. Joyce on behalf of Defendant Heartland Family Services.(Joyce, Leigh) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Leigh C. Joyce on behalf of Defendant Heartland Family Services.(Joyce, Leigh) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Heartland Family Services. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (ADB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Travis B Franklin from District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, Case number CI 19-6051 ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4004827) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Leigh C. Joyce on behalf of Heartland Family Services (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of the State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B-Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Joyce, Leigh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
