Hillesheim v. Beekman Street Partners L.P.
Zach Hillesheim |
Beekman Street Partners L.P. |
8:2019cv00402 |
September 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Laurie Smith Camp |
Michael D Nelson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendant shall have an extension of time to December 6, 2019, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN) |
Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Sara A. McCue on behalf of Defendant Beekman Street Partners L.P..(McCue, Sara) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendant shall have an extension of time to November 7, 2019, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Beekman Street Partners L.P. (Moore, Scott) |
Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Sara A. McCue on behalf of Defendant Beekman Street Partners L.P..(McCue, Sara) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Beekman Street Partners L.P. on 9/17/2019. (KLF) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Beekman Street Partners L.P. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (KLF) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Laurie Smith Camp and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (KLF) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Beekman Street Partners L.P. regarding Complaint #1 . (Browne, Padraigin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Beekman Street Partners L.P. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4015302), by Attorney Padraigin L. Browne on behalf of Zach Hillesheim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Browne, Padraigin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hillesheim v. Beekman Street Partners L.P. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Zach Hillesheim | |
Represented By: | Padraigin L. Browne |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Beekman Street Partners L.P. | |
Represented By: | Sara A. McCue |
Represented By: | Scott P. Moore |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.