Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA v. Schroeder
Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA |
Nancy Schroeder |
8:2019cv00472 |
October 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Susan M Bazis |
Robert F Rossiter |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to defendant Nancy Schroeder. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LKO) |
Filing 5 Summons Requested as to Nancy Schroeder regarding Complaint, #1 . (Hedican, Christopher) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Farm Credit Services of America, ACA for Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA. by Attorney Christopher R. Hedican on behalf of Plaintiffs Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA, Farm Credit Services of America, ACA.(Hedican, Christopher) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Plaintiff Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Nancy Schroeder ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4046312), by Attorney Christopher R. Hedican on behalf of Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Assignment, Nonsolicitation, and Nondisclosure Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Severance Agreement)(Hedican, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA v. Schroeder | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy Schroeder | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA | |
Represented By: | Christopher R. Hedican |
Represented By: | David P. Kennison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.