Bumann v. Nebraska Mental Health Board et al
| Matthew Headley, Nebraska Mental Health Board, Mental Health Board of Madison County and Joe Smith |
| Justin Bumann |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2019cv00552 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel on behalf of Petitioner Justin Bumann. (LKO) |
Filing 4
ORDER. It is ordered that: Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(KLL)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Justin Bumann. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of pro se petitioner Justin Bumann. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
