Grant v. U.S. Department of Defense
| William Lee Grant, II |
| U.S. Department of Defense |
| 8:2019cv00559 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT - PRO SE - Pursuant to the court's Memorandum and Order filed this date, judgment is hereby entered providing that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for improper venue. Plaintiff shall not file another lawsuit making the same allegations in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, as Plaintiff has now been informed three times that this court is an improper venue for his claims. Judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER. It is ordered that leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(KLL)
|
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2016-02: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Senior Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (ADB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff William Lee Grant, II. (ADB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Department of Defense; no Summons(es) issued ; filed on behalf of William Lee Grant, II. (Scanned document has been compared to the paper document and it has been determined that the scanned document is as legible as the paper document.)(ADB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Grant v. U.S. Department of Defense | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Department of Defense | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Lee Grant, II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
