Oak Services II, LLC v. Universal Warranty Corporation et al
| Oak Services II, LLC |
| Ally Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Universal Warranty Corporation |
| 8:2020cv00009 |
| January 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed upon defendant Universal Warranty Corporation. Waiver sent on 1/7/2020. (Marcus, David) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed upon defendant Ally Insurance Holdings, Inc.. Waiver sent on 1/7/2020. (Marcus, David) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ORDER due to duplicate payment, the filing fee in the amount of $400.00 is refunded to the payor, David L. Marcus, receipt number ANEDC-4088363. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JLS) |
| Filing 11 REDACTED COMPLAINT with jury demand against Ally Insurance Holdings, Inc., Universal Warranty Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4088363), by Attorney David L. Marcus on behalf of Oak Services II, LLC (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Marcus, David) Modified on 1/8/2020 to add redacted per attorney (LKO). |
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Joint Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act. Access to the Complaint #1 shall be restricted to parties of record and court users. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 9 JOINT MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act by Attorney David L. Marcus on behalf of Plaintiff Oak Services II, LLC.(Marcus, David) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to defendant Ally Insurance Holdings, Inc., Universal Warranty Corporation YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 7 Summons Requested as to Ally Insurance Holdings Inc. regarding Complaint, #1 . (Marcus, David) |
| Filing 6 Summons Requested as to Universal Warranty Corporation regarding Complaint, #1 . (Marcus, David) |
| Filing 5 Summons Requested as to Ally Insurance Holdings Inc. regarding Complaint, #1 . (Marcus, David) |
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Universal Warranty Corporation regarding Complaint, #1 . (Marcus, David) |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Ally Insurance Holdings Inc. regarding Complaint, #1 . (Marcus, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Ally Insurance Holdings, Inc., Universal Warranty Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4087431), by Attorney David L. Marcus on behalf of Oak Services II, LLC (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Marcus, David) ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENTS ARE RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.3(c). Modified on 1/8/2020 to add restriction per text order 10 and at the direction of chambers. (LKO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
