Roth Grading, Inc. v. Martin Brothers Construction
Plaintiff: Roth Grading, Inc.
Defendant: Martin Brothers Construction
Case Number: 8:2020cv00010
Filed: January 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Michael D Nelson
Referring Judge: Robert F Rossiter
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Plaintiff Roth Grading, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue (Filing No. 11) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Defendant Martin Brothers Construction's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 5) for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (ADB)
February 13, 2020 Case transferred to United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Original electronic file sent. (ADB)
February 6, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION to Change Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1406 and Motion for Extension of Time by Attorney Aaron F. Smeall on behalf of Plaintiff Roth Grading, Inc..(Smeall, Aaron)
January 21, 2020 Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Patrick T. Vint on behalf of Defendant Martin Brothers Construction.(Vint, Patrick)
January 21, 2020 Filing 9 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Plaintiff Roth Grading, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS)
January 21, 2020 Filing 8 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Martin Brothers Construction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS)
January 20, 2020 Filing 7 INDEX in support of MOTION to Dismiss #5 by Attorney Patrick T. Vint on behalf of Defendant Martin Brothers Construction.(Vint, Patrick)
January 20, 2020 Filing 6 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss #5 by Attorney Patrick T. Vint on behalf of Defendant Martin Brothers Construction. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Patrick T. Vint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Vint, Patrick)
January 20, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Attorney Patrick T. Vint on behalf of Defendant Martin Brothers Construction.(Vint, Patrick)
January 8, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Martin Brothers Construction YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM)
January 8, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Martin Brothers Construction regarding Complaint, #1 . (Smeall, Aaron)
January 8, 2020 Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM)
January 8, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin Brothers Construction ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4088337), by Attorney Aaron F. Smeall on behalf of Roth Grading, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Contract, #2 Exhibit B - Martin Brothers Purchase Order)(Smeall, Aaron)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roth Grading, Inc. v. Martin Brothers Construction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin Brothers Construction
Represented By: Todd W. Weidemann
Represented By: Patrick T. Vint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roth Grading, Inc.
Represented By: Aaron F. Smeall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?