Vasser v. USA
Warren Dwayne Vasser |
USA |
8:2020cv00042 |
January 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Laurie Smith Camp |
Habeas Corpus: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Remark - Public: Terminated case pursuant to order #103 and #104 of Judge Smith Camp in case number 8:17cr372 denying motion to vacate 2255. (ADB) |
Remark - Public: Case opened for statistical purposes only. See criminal case 8:17CR372 for pleadings. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vasser v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Warren Dwayne Vasser | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.