Kaup et al v. Monsanto Company
| LaVonne Kaup and Michael N. Kaup |
| Monsanto Company |
| 8:2020cv00044 |
| January 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 LETTER by Clerk regarding Notice of Removal - Complaint, #1 with copy of docket sheet to Multidistrict Litigation Panel Office. (LRM) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Request for Location of Trial by Attorney Michael K. Huffer on behalf of Defendant Monsanto Company (Huffer, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against All Plaintiffs from District Court of Platte County, Case number 19-487 ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4099048) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Michael K. Huffer on behalf of Monsanto Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Huffer, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
