Becker v. Friendship Program, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Timothy Becker
Defendant: Friendship Program, Inc. and Katherine Young
Case Number: 8:2020cv00132
Filed: April 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Susan M Bazis
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting Defendants' email motion for extension of time. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by July 6, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRH)
April 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by May 26, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRH)
April 20, 2020 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Jessica C. Kallstrom-Schreckengost on behalf of Defendant Friendship Program, Inc..(Kallstrom-Schreckengost, Jessica)
April 20, 2020 Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Jessica C. Kallstrom-Schreckengost on behalf of Defendants Friendship Program, Inc., Katherine Young.(Kallstrom-Schreckengost, Jessica)
April 2, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendants Friendship Program, Inc., and Katherine Young. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM)
April 2, 2020 Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM)
April 2, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (Sanford, Josh)
April 2, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Friendship Program, Inc. regarding Complaint #1 . (Sanford, Josh)
April 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4140411), by Attorney Josh Sanford on behalf of Timothy Becker (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Josh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Becker v. Friendship Program, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Becker
Represented By: Josh Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Friendship Program, Inc.
Represented By: Jessica C. Kallstrom-Schreckengost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katherine Young
Represented By: Jessica C. Kallstrom-Schreckengost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?